All case studies & publications

Healthcare · Patient Care Management · Medical Records

Automated Patient Discharge Communications from Clinical Coding for a UK Healthcare Provider

Anonymised engagement
Client
Healthcare provider · United Kingdom · clinical services on hardware-secured patient systems
Industry
Healthcare
Department
Operations
Region
United Kingdom · UK & Ireland

A patient leaving a clinic deserves a plain-language account of exactly what was done, for how long and with what medication. Writing that by hand for every patient does not scale, and getting it wrong is not a normal software bug. We built a UiPath automation that reads the clinical coding in the patient file and issues a patient-ready letter or email, unattended, inside the provider's own security model.

A working model of the approach on sample data. It plays on its own and pauses when scrolled away; nothing here touches a live system.

The results

3
care details in every communication
Procedures, length of stay in days, medication administered. Scope, not a saving.
2
delivery routes to the patient
Email or letter, issued automatically. Scope, not a saving.
1
custom UiPath App built for the project
Working alongside UiPath IPA. Scope; no volumes were recorded.

The challenge

Our client is a UK healthcare provider. After a procedure or a course of treatment, patients need a clear account of what was done to them. That information lives in the clinic's internal patient files as clinical coding, not as plain language a patient can read.

What it was costing them

  • Accounts of care written by hand. Every communication had to be translated from coding into plain language by clinical or admin staff, for every patient.
  • A process that does not scale. More patients meant more letters drafted by hand.
  • Mistakes with real consequences. An error in a patient's account of their own care is a patient-safety-adjacent issue, not an inconvenience.
  • A security bar far above back-office automation. Patient data is among the most sensitive any system holds, and access to the clinical system is protected by hardware-based authentication. Anything automated had to meet the same standard as a person.
From clinical coding to a letter the patient can read
  • Clinical coding in the file
  • Translated to plain language
  • Letter or email to the patient

The approach

We built a UiPath automation that runs from raw clinical coding straight through to a patient-ready communication, with nobody drafting the text by hand.

From patient file to patient letter

  1. Clinical coding interpretation. The automation reads the internal patient files and uses the clinical coding to determine exactly which procedures, treatments and care the patient received.
  2. Plain-language translation. The coded data becomes an understandable letter or email covering procedure details, length of stay in days and medication administered.
  3. Delivery. The finished communication is issued to the patient by email or letter.

A purpose-built UiPath App

We built a custom UiPath App specifically for this project, working alongside UiPath IPA (intelligent process automation) for the read, interpret and generate pipeline.

From patient file to patient communication
  • Patient file
  • Coding interpretation
  • Communication generated
  • Delivery
Runs unattended inside the provider's own security model.

Unattended, inside the provider's security model

Access to the clinical system depends on hardware-based authentication, standard practice for medical data of this kind. Because the automation had to run unattended, the provider's own IT team provisioned an approved way for the robot to authenticate without a person present. We designed the automation to work within that arrangement, not around it.

Technology

LayerWhat we used
AutomationUiPath IPA (intelligent process automation)
ApplicationA custom UiPath App built for this project
InterpretationClinical coding turned into plain-language text
DeliveryPatient communication by email or letter
SecurityThe provider's hardware-based authentication, with unattended access provisioned by its IT team

The outcome

Patients receive a plain-language account of their care automatically, generated directly from clinical coding, without a clinician or admin staff member drafting it by hand for each patient.

BeforeAfter
Turning coding into plain languageClinical or admin staff, per patientAutomatic
Procedures, length of stay, medicationDrafted by handGenerated from the coding
Sending the communicationPrepared by handEmail or letter, issued automatically
Access to the clinical systemA person, authenticated in personThe robot, through access the provider's IT provisioned
  • One pipeline from coding to a patient-ready letter, not a partial tool that still needs someone to write the final text.
  • Runs unattended within the provider's own security model, not around it.
  • Clinical and admin staff no longer draft each account of care by hand.
  • Not quantified. No volumes or timings survive for this engagement; the figures above describe scope, not savings.

The risk most teams miss

Automation in clinical systems often stalls on authentication designed for people, and the tempting fix is a workaround. A workaround is the one thing a healthcare security team will not accept, and should not. The approach that holds is the one taken here: the provider's own IT team provisions an approved route, and the robot meets the same access standard as any person using the system.

Related work

View all

Next step

Start the same conversation

Tell us the process that keeps breaking. We will come back with what it would take to fix it, what it would cost, and what we would measure.

Book a working sessionSee ways to start

Or write to us directly: •••••@•••••••.•••

  • A reply from a partner within one business day
  • Fixed scope and fixed fee, agreed before we start
  • The maps and the backlog are yours either way